Showing posts with label Fort Hood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fort Hood. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Lib'rul media remembers Hasan, forgets F.E.A.R.





Well you know me, always out to expose the dastardly lib'rul media.  

Seriously though, I can't understand why my liberal co-conspirators in the media pay so little attention to this crazy story about a shadowy, murderous, drug-dealing, anti-government militia group operating inside the U.S. Military?  

I mean, we still see stories about the Fort Hood shooter, including the saga of his beard... and I'm sure it has nothing to do with his being Muslim, no sirree.  

Conservative bloviators like Michelle Malkin and Mark Steyn have done their best to keep three-year-old Nidal Hasan story alive and stir up fear that he is just the tip of the Islamist iceberg in the military.  Yet the right-wing as well as MSM media (whatever that is) both ignore F.E.A.R.  

Could it be that my fellow liberals ensconced in their corporate media fronts for left-wing brainwashing operations are napping on the job, or.... (gasp!) could it be that there is no liberal media at all?  


By Don Terry
August 29, 2013 | Southern Poverty Law Center


SPLC Intelligence Report | Fall 2013

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

What links Texas-Georgia Army plots?

Nope, there is definitely nothing about a Democratic POTUS that drives redneck Republicans batshit insane.  This is just normal.  It could happen to any president.  I'm sure that crazy white militia guys will be lining up to overthrow and/or assassinate Romney if he wins.  

(The "F.E.A.R." group's ringleader worked as a lowly page at the 2008 Republican National Convention.  You've come a long way, baby!)

Seriously though, after one Army soldier who was Muslim went nuts at Fort Hood some conservatives were saying we have Muslim jihad inside the U.S. Military.  Now that at least five white soldiers in Georgia were plotting genuine treason and mass murder of American civilians, and murdered their own friends to keep it a secret, what will those same anti-Muslim conservatives say, I wonder?  

Anyhow, I doubt these conservative jihad-mongers could be in deeper denial than the Army spokesman who stated: "Fort Stewart-Hunter Army Airfield does not have a gang or militia problem."  I wonder what does qualify as a "problem" in their book?

And what will gun control opponents say to the fact that these soldiers legally purchased $87,00 worth of semi-automatic assault rifles, other guns, and bomb-making components in preparation to execute their plot?  That it was their God-given right to accumulate all those instruments of death?  Why am I asking these stupid rhetorical questions when I know all the answers?  

Here's the underlying connection between Hassan-Fort Hood and these guys: legal, accessible and deadly firearms.  Our inability to "infringe" on the the right of these citizens -- who had no criminal record -- to buy whatever kind of guns, clips and ammo they wanted, thanks to the 2nd Amendment, is outdated and absurd.  There is no good reason for anybody to buy them.


By Russ Bynum 
August 27, 2012 | Associated Press

Monday, January 10, 2011

2010 Ft. Hood suicides set record, out-kill Hasan

So it seems that PTSD has been a much more prolific and enduring killer at Ft. Hood than Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan.

But we can't arrest, try and execute PTSD. It's intangible, depressing and glum. It's an unspeakable wussy downer in a nation that tells us to "get over it."



Despite outreach, self-inflicted deaths hit record

By Gregg Zoroya
January 9, 2010 | USA Today

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Ft. Hood massacre: Different but the same

As usual, Going Postal author Mark Ames is the authority on post-shooting-massacre reportage (see below), although many facts are still sketchy. Predictably, right-wingers are latching onto the facts that the shooter, Major Nasan, was Muslim and didn't want to be deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, as if these two facts should have been obvious tipoffs to the military to throw Hasan in the brig, intern him at G'itmo, or Lord knows what.

UPDATE (Nov. 10, 2009): There are a lot of reports coming out now about Hasan's connections to Islamists and sympathy for terrorists, but the facts are still sketchy. We also don't know the extent to which the CIA was already aware of Hasan's rhetoric and connections.

But I think other facts of this massacre are more interesting. Apparently, using two handguns, Hasan managed to shoot over 40 soldiers on a military base before two civilian police officers took him down (one a "tough woman" cop no less!). I find that amazing. It's an argument for gun control staring us in the face. Indeed, who should be better trained and equipped to react to a shooting massacre than our nation's soldiers? (On the flip side, who is better trained to kill efficiently?) And yet, it seems, these soldiers were caught by surprise and unable to stop Hasan from killing 13 people and wounding another 38 in a span of 5 minutes. In fact, this mass shooting seems identical to most other school and workplace shootings: people screaming, confused, taking cover anywhere they can, and then the police arriving on the scene either to kill the shooter or find his suicided corpse.

UPDATE (Nov. 13, 2009): It now seems, a la Jessica Lynch, that early reports of a heroic woman cop were overblown. One witness reports all she did was get shot and fall down, and it was a black policeman who "neutralized and secured" Hasan. The black policeman said as much.

Yeah, I'm gonna catch flak for even implying that our soliders are not flawless supermen, but relax. I think the whole thing is entirely explainable: they were on their base, the place where they probably felt safest on Earth; and many of them probably recognized Hasan, or were perhaps even treated by him. What's atypical in this case is that the victims found nothing inherently alarming or scary about seeing someone with a gun -- which was actually to their detriment. Contrast this with a student in his familiar desk at school, or an office clerk in his cubicle: the last place either would expect anything dangerous or out-of-the-ordinary to happen. In the few seconds it takes for the brain to process what is happening -- "hey, isn't that so-and-so, the guy who... hey, is that a gun? no, couldn't be, he's so quiet and I heard that ... oh no! he's pointing it at me and he looks strange, run!..." -- the victim has already been shot, perhaps fatally. The two situations -- military base vs. school or office -- aren't that different after all. Familiarity breeds complacency.

Remember, this all happened in 5 minutes with a few non-military-issue handguns, not M-16s or anything you wouldn't find in anyplace in the USA. Indeed, Hasan's expertise with semi-automatic weapons -- which must have required re-loading, think about that -- meant he could score a higher body count -- another argument for everybody's being an expert with firearms.

I suppose the "More Guns Make Us Safer" crowd will advocate our military's carrying handguns with them at all times while on base, in order to end future shooting rampages more quickly. However, I expect our non-political, no-nonsense U.S. Military will have none of it. Or perhaps they'll caution us all to be vigilant at all times to shooting massacres, but it's just not humanly possible to be always on high alert, even for the world's best professional soldiers.

As usual, reasonable, rational people see one uniting factor in all these massacres, and hence come to one inescapable conclusion: easy access to an abundance of firearms is the problem. So what are we going to do about it? As usual, nothing. Apparently, we hate ourselves, each other, and our country so much that we wish literal "Death to America!"


Fort Hood Massacre: A Brief History of American Violence
By Mark Ames
November 6, 2009 | The Exiled

URL: http://exiledonline.com/fort-hood-massacre-a-brief-history-of-american-violence/