Taibbi: NYPD protests by making arrests 'only when they have to'?!

Before you jump with a knee-jerk reaction in defense of the NYPD because they saved the universe on 9/11, you should keep in mind that "... the protesting [NYC] police have decided to make arrests "only when they have to." (Let that sink in for a moment. Seriously, take 10 or 15 seconds)."

Yeah, think about that. Isn't that how we want police to do their job all the time?

The NYPD's 'Work Stoppage' Is Surreal

By Matt Taibbi

December 31, 2014 | Rolling Stone

URL: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-nypds-work-stoppage-is-surreal-20141231

Editorial: NYPD spying violated 4th Amendment

If you really want to know more about this fascist, un-Constitutional scandal perpetrated by Bloomberg's NYPD, read this debate between Paul J. Browne, New York City Police Department's Deputy Commissioner of Public Information, and Jethro Eisenstein, civil rights attorney and co-counsel on the Handschu case, which put limits on how police may carry out "political investigations."


NYPD spying violates Fourth Amendment

From the editors

Posted: 3/26/07

Prior to the 2004 Republican National Convention held at Madison Square Garden, a New York Police Department division dubbed the "RNC Intelligence Squad" traveled around America and to Europe and the Middle East to surveil activist groups interested in protesting or disrupting the event, The New York Times reported.


The NYPD sent representatives pretending to be sympathizers to 15 states and abroad to report directly to New York, which led to the arrest of more than 1,800 people before or during the four-day convention.


While the City of New York could take no shortcuts to ensure the safety of the convention's guests, what authority does a city police department have to oversee the investigation of groups outside its jurisdiction?


The New York Civil Liberties Union, which represents the arrested protesters, contends the NYPD overstepped its boundaries by targeting groups with no obvious plans to break the law.


According to court documents, the NYPD's wide-ranging list of suspects included the theater troupe Billionaires for Bush, which intentionally avoids confrontations that could lead to arrests, and Bands Against Bush, which organized speeches and concerts in five cities during the convention, The Times reported.


While the department's tactics were approved under the outdated Handscu Authority, which was created in 1980 in response to the NYPD's unreasonable surveillance of Vietnam protesters, at no time did the squad have to answer to federal authorities.


While the city cannot rely solely on the intelligence it receives from national agencies, probing groups internationally should require more than the approval of Handscu, which was intended solely to monitor the actions of the NYPD.


The NYPD should have deferred to federal authorities, which have the standing resources and expertise to handle such a task, instead of cutting the Fourth Amendment's corners in its own investigation.

NYPD spied on protesters before GOP Convention

The revelation that undercover NYPD officers traveled the U.S. and Europe gathering intel on people who planned to protest peacefully at the 2004 GOP Convention is outrageous, and totally opposed to what we expect from our police in a free society.

This is something I would expect to read about in Moscow or Tehran, not New York City!

This news is even more disturbing than the new trend of un-Constitutional "free speech zones" at the Democratic and Republican conventions, where protesters were corralled into pens far away from the convention delegates.

The comments of 1st Amendment lawyer Julie Hilden on "free speech zones" applies just as well to the NYPD's spying on U.S. citizens who are not under any suspicion of any criminal acts:

"Like the statement that protest is unpatriotic, the statement that protesters are likely to be terrorists, or likely to be otherwise violent, is damaging to our status as a free society. This assumption also collapses upon examination: Why would someone trying to change the system through protest be more likely than others to resort to violence to destroy the system?"

I would only add that, besides voting, protest is really all we, the Average Joes, have at our disposal to influence our leaders. And even voting is often a futile exercise, depending where you live. So, that only leaves protest as a means of political expression. If we take that right away or infringe upon it, America won't be America anymore.

Report: New York Cops Tracked Activists Ahead of 2004 Republican Convention
Saturday , March 24, 2007
Associated Press

NEW YORK — Undercover New York police officers traveled around the United States and to Europe to observe activists who planned to protest at the 2004 Republican National Convention — including hundreds who showed no sign of illegal intent, a newspaper reported.

Posing as activists or sympathizers, the officers attended meetings of political groups in at least 15 U.S. states and filed reports with the police department's intelligence division, The New York Times reported on its Web site Saturday.

The officers involved in the "RNC Intelligence Squad" then identified certain groups as potential threats, the Times reported, citing hundreds of still-secret reports it viewed from the police department's intelligence division. The police often shared information with departments in other cities.

Police spokesman Paul Browne said the activities were legal. He said the operation was an essential part of preparations for the huge crowds that came to the city during the convention.

"Detectives collected information both in-state and out-of-state to learn in advance what was coming our way," Browne told the Times.

The secret digests said some of the groups planned acts such as blocking intersections and hacking into Web sites. But the Times reported that the vast majority of the reports it viewed described people who gave no obvious sign of wrongdoing, such as members of the satirical performance-art group "Billionaires for Bush" and a group that had planned concerts with political speeches.

Donna Lieberman, the executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, said the revelations of "spying" were shocking.

"The New York Civil Liberties Union condemns this operation and is considering legal action against the police department," she said in a statement.

More than 1,800 people were arrested at the four-day convention at Madison Square Garden, where President George W. Bush accepted his party's nomination for a second term in office. The convention was policed by as many as 10,000 officers.

Pending civil rights lawsuits have challenged the legitimacy of the arrests. Documents released under a court order in January showed that arrested protesters were held before their initial court appearances for up to six times longer than those arrested on charges unrelated to the convention.

The documents also show that the 2001 terrorist attacks heavily influenced the city's decision to detain and fingerprint hundreds of protesters at the convention.

In 2003, a federal judge — at the behest of Mayor Michael Bloomberg — broadened the NYPD's authority to investigate political, social and religious groups. Browne insisted police have not abused the new guidelines.

Browne told the Times that the 18 months of preparation before the convention allowed hundreds of thousands of people to demonstrate while also ensuring that the convention had relatively few disruptions.

"It was a great success, and despite provocations, such as demonstrators throwing faux feces in the faces of police officers, the NYPD showed professionalism and restraint," he told the Times.