Showing posts with label Confederate flag. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Confederate flag. Show all posts

Sunday, July 31, 2016

Bayer: Trump, treason and Confederate rebels

These days I don't post much to TILIS because I've just about blown my wad; I've said everything that I can possibly say about America's political economy that is not just blow-for-blow, he said/she said bullshit, or simple repetition with further supporting facts.

But Alexei Bayer's on-point op-ed in the Kyiv Post hit on so many ugly, uncomfortable truths about America that I just had to. [Bold mine].

Apropos, I encourage readers to check out one of my most popular posts on the strange schizophrenia, the cognitive dissonance, of Americans who fly the rebel battle flag yet claim they are the most patriotic, "real Americans:" The Confederate flag: Celebrating treason.



Trump's treasonous candidacy
By Alexei Bayer
Kyiv Post | July 30, 2016

Five months ago, I wrote a column titled “Why does America want a Putin in the White House?” (Kyiv Post, Feb. 20). It was, of course, about the affinity between Donald Trump, then a leading contender for the Republican nomination, and Russia’s Vladimir Putin.

Since then, Trump became a Republican nominee and the affinity between him and Putin has been shown to be a direct connection, not just a mere similarity. His people purged the Republican platform of its rather important and widely supported plank, calling for supplying Ukraine with weapons to combat separatists and defend itself against Russian aggression. It was, incidentally, the only point of the platform they cared about and had any interest in changing.

Trump then talked about reneging on America’s treaty obligation to come to the defense of its NATO allies - meaning Eastern European and ex-Soviet member-states - if Russia attacked or tried to destabilize them. More recently, it has been revealed that Russian hackers were almost certainly behind the theft of the Democratic National Committee’s emails, which were made public via Wikileaks on the eve of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia.

And now Trump has announced that as president he would consider recognizing Crimea as part of Russia and removing economic sanctions. He has publicly invited Russians to commit an illegal and hostile act: to hack US servers in order to help him win in November. Even if Trump was making a sarcastic remark as he now claims - a big if - it was, at the very least, dangerous. Henry II could also claim that inquiring “Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?” was nothing but a joke - but Thomas Beckett ending up dead was no laughing matter.

As a result of these events, lots of people started to dig into Trump’s business connections with Russian oligarchs and his advisors’ dealings with various unsavory post-Soviet characters. Conservative pundit George Will - a staunch opponent of Trump - has indicated in this regard that having Trump release his tax returns (which Trump says are being audited and therefore can’t be shown publicly) is now imperative: the nation needs to see how much the self-proclaimed billionaire is in hock to various Russian interests.

Indeed, I believe that Hillary Clinton should refuse to debate Trump until he shows his tax returns - on the very likely assumption that the Republican candidate may be liable to be persecuted for high treason. Also, it's the least the American public should do, considering that Trump himself spent years demanding that Barack Obama show him his birth certificate.

Plus, in view of Trump’s invitation to Russian hackers, a possibility has opened up that someone might hack into the IRS to ferret out Trump’s taxes.

The interesting question is this: will Trump’s flag-waving, America-first supporters turn away from him because he has been shown to be chummy with the Russians?

Not in the least. I have recently been travelling the back roads of rural Pennsylvania. It’s Trump territory and even though Philadelphia, parts of Pittsburgh and college towns across the state are heavily pro-Hillary, the Keystone State as a whole is very much in play. In some polls, Trump has been shown to be in the lead.

What strikes you is the abundance of Confederate flags bedecking people’s houses. I have also seen this in upstate New York, a state that Trump says he will win thanks to his support in rural areas, on Long Island and some New York City boroughs - including, amazingly enough, among Russian-speaking Jews on Brighton Beach.

New York and Pennsylvania were the core part of the Union and major routes of the Underground Railroad. The two states suffered the largest number of battle deaths in the Civil War among Northern states.

The Confederate flag is flown typically by Trump supporters side by side with the Stars and Stripes. Even though the Southern secession was a treasonous and subversive act, these people consider themselves true patriots - much truer, apparently, than the official Washington for which they harbor nothing but profound disdain.

Those Confederate flags proliferated after last year’s shooting of nine black parishioners in Charleston, South Carolina. Horrified by the racist attack, state officials decided to remove the Confederate flag from the State Capitol. Since then, flying it has become an act of defiance, a way to stick a finger in the eye of the authorities at all levels and a show of contempt for political correctness and the liberal dogma.

This is the milieu from which Trump draws his support. His core constituency is not in opposition to the existing government as much as it is hostile. Trump’s voters, while wrapping themselves in the flag, are declaring themselves to be against the United States of America, its political system, its institutions and its Constitution. They are nihilists rejecting the very principles on which the country was built.

They are, to put it bluntly, America’s enemies. This is why their flag-bearer, Trump, has no program how he’s going to govern and why almost everything he promises to do contravenes the Constitution. Some statements he makes suggest that he has never even read the document.

This is also why joining forces with Putin, whose propaganda spreads lies about the United States in different languages and whose government believes that it is already in a state of hybrid war with Washington, is so natural for Trump. As he embraces America’s enemies, Trump’s supporters remain completely unfazed. On the contrary, it would be perfectly natural for them to follow their leader and start admiring Putin for being decisive, direct and s great leader.

Anthony Burgess has written about it in his 1962 novel, Clockwork Orange. In the book, violent hoodlums from lower middle class housing estates invent and use Natsat, a teen slang consisting mostly of Russian-inspired words such as kisa (girl), krovy (blood) and jeezny (life). They are siding with the enemy with the express purpose of taking the mickey out of their elders, teachers and cops.

And so Trump’s voters might now want add the Russian tricolor - or, better still, the flag of the self-proclaimed Novorossia, which incidentally is a carbon copy of the Confederate flag - to the flags they are already flying.

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

You're welcome, Tea Partyers, for this opportunity

Since Tea Partyers are the first Americans to ask, "Where are all the moderate Muslims denouncing terrorism?" I'm going to give those same people the first shot at denouncing their racist, anti-American tea party brethren in New Mexico.  The Confederate flag, as I've said before, isn't only a symbol of treason and institutional racism, but it is certainly symbolic of those things.

So, my friends, you're welcome for this opportunity to prove your moderate views.  

(Psst!  Now's the part where you e-mail all your friends, call your neighbors, post to your blogs, confess to your priests, write a letter to the editor, take out an ad in the local paper, staple fliers to telephone poles, etc., etc.  Because if you don't, you are condoning racism!  It's really that simple.)

(P.S. -- The only political float at my home town's 4th of July parade this year was a Tea Party-sponsored Nobama float with "End of an Error" and similar slogans all over it.  These classy fellas picked just the right day of national unity to diss our elected President.  Nice.  Look, I get it that 99.9 percent of the town is Republican, but... didn't that make their overtly disrespectful political statement on our nation's birthday that much more pointless and mean?)


By Nick Wing
July 10, 2012 | Huffington Post

Friday, September 2, 2011

Banning the rebel flag, one city at a time

Congrats to the Old South for doing something right, albeit 146 years too late. You recall that I've written before about the anti-American Confederate flag, and how it doesn't jibe with latter day Southerners' avowed patriotism for the United States, aka the Union.

But some Southern Tea-Party types just don't get it: "'I am a firm believer in the freedom to express our individual rights, which include flying the flag that we decide to fly,' said Philip Way, a Civil War re-enactor dressed in a Confederate wool uniform despite the summer temperatures. 'That's freedom to me.'"

The ordinance affects only public (municipal) displays of the Confedrate Flag; private displays are unaffected.

So "freedom," it seems, is a relative word. While anti-government conservatives say they want Big Gubument out of their lives, what they really mean -- like the rest of us -- is that they want government to promote their values, while diminishing others'. That's freedom for them.

Those retrograde bumpkins in wool underpants still have the right to fly their treasonous flag; but the People have spoken, and They don't want the rebel flag flown in the victor's halls.

And if you don't like it, look away, Dixieland!


September 2, 2011 | CBS News

Monday, March 19, 2007

The Confederate flag: Celebrating treason

The X has risen again, this time in Florida, where loyal Sons of the South are expressing shock and disgust at a sculpture entitled, "The Proper Way to Hang a Confederate Flag," which features the Confederate battle flag hanging in a noose.



Part of an exhibit entitled AfroProvocations at the Mary Brogan Museum of Art and Science in Tallahassee that opened as part of Black History Month, the flag-&-noose installation is the product of black “political artist” John Sims.

A 1961 Florida law actually says it’s illegal to defile or "cast contempt upon" the Confederate flag "by word or act." Florida sent 15,000 men into the Civil War, the highest percentage by population of men of military age from the Confederate states; and 5,000 Floridians died from wounds or disease. Florida's Civil War governor shot himself rather than face reunion with the North. Not surprisingly, Florida has some emotional “issues” when it comes to the Confederate flag.
Four other states – Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi and South Carolina – also have laws protecting the Confederate flag. That’s five out of 11 ex-Confederate States. In South Carolina, the Confederate flag still flies on the statehouse’s capitol dome, the cause of much recent controversy.

Ironically, Sims, a Detroit native, didn't know about the Florida law before he made his piece, but now that he does, he says, “that's the first thing we should deal with. This law should be taken off the books."

Naturally, True Sons and Daughters of the South disagree.

"That display is extremely offensive. It's very tasteless," said Robert Hurst, the leader of the local Sons of Confederate Veterans group, whose great-great-grandfather led a company for the Confederacy and committed suicide after the South's surrender. "This teaches contempt for not only the Confederate flag but for everything associated with it."

And “everything associated with it” would be…what? Rebellion? Defeat? Slavery? Suicide? The color gray?
* * *
Look, sorry to be so blunt, but this whole debate should have been resolved a long, long time ago. In 1865, to be exact, when the Confederacy (aka The South) lost, and the Union (aka The North, aka The United States of America) won.
Let’s remember that for a second: America won, the Confederacy lost. “We” (America) won. We beat them, and America exists today in all its 50 States because of it.

The fact that we even let “them” (today, they are us) fly the Confederate flag after their defeat has been a testament to America’s magnanimous and charitable spirit.
Our graciousness then to our defeated Southern brethren was also proof that, contrary to the South’s inflated worst fears leading up to 1861, the North never had any intention of dictating every last detail of the States’ lives by federal fiat. Post-war, America’s thinking surely was, “If they want to fly their little X, why not let them? What harm could it do?”

That was surely expedient at the time, when America’s first priority was patching up nasty old wounds in the South as quickly as possible. But today, we can see at least two bad consequences because of the U.S. federal government’s failure to outlaw the Confederate flag in the 1860s.

First, partly because we (the United States) didn't obliterate this symbol of the Confederacy, the South can’t forget the scabs of old war wounds: they keep picking and licking them, which leaves a sour taste in their mouths, politically and socially. Having lived in Alabama, I’ve seen firsthand this peculiar – what they would reckon “noble” – Southern pride in having lost. It lives to this day. It is passed from father to son, mother to daughter. (I shudder to think how insufferably haughty the South would have been to this day had they won.)

The South is also home to more than its fair share of Civil War re-enactors and respected historians (often carrying the risible title of “Professor of Southern Studies.”) Again, it’s peculiar how faithfully, meticulously, and proudly they recall their total defeat.

It’s also peculiar, if you think about it, how utterly absent is the contrary identification with victory in the Northern states. For anyone not born in the South, there is no “us” and “them” dating back to the 19th century. For us, the Civil War is something we spend a week or two studying in high school, and that’s it. The present reality is all that matters: We are an indivisible union of States, “with liberty and justice for all.” We may consider some Southerners to be backward, gun-loving, snake-handling bumpkins, but we still think of them as part of us, for better or worse.

Granted, for many Southerners, the motivation for all this Civil War nostalgia – which is pathetic, let’s face it – is the same motivation of anyone in any place who wishes to know and preserve his past. And while the South’s past has a lot of things probably best forgotten, it’s the only past they’ve got. I get that.

For others, however, something more sinister – and ignorant – lurks behind all this sepia-tinted nostalgia for a bygone age. Sinister, because they harbor active, lingering resentment and recriminations towards… whom? They’re not entirely sure. Certainly uppity blacks. The federal government, probably. Or anybody who doesn’t favor loose federalism and States’ rights.

Unfortunately, there is hardly anybody left for Southerners to harbor resentment against: no more "bluebellies" or "carpet baggers" roam and pillage the South with impunity; the reviled Republican Party of the North is now the beloved Republican Party of the South; and everyone from that era, most importantly Lincoln, is dead.

That only leaves blacks, who can't seem to stop being black, no matter where they're from or whom they vote for.

The ignorant part is Southerners' schizophrenic dual loyalty – to the dead Confederacy, and to the current US of A – which they hardly stop to think about or reconcile. Today, the South takes pride in being more unwaveringly and vocally patriotic than the rest of America; and a disproportionate number of our U.S. soldiers come from the South.

I’m no historian, but I can’t think of any historical equivalent of our bizarre Union-hating, America-loving South. The Basques in Spain? The Irish in Britain? Nobody else seems to fit the bill. If I’m wrong, please enlighten me.

Anyway, why is Southerners’ seething but abstract resentment of any importance? Well, frankly, because thanks to air-conditioning, demographics, and economic growth, the South suddenly matters. Since Watergate, it has gone from a reliably Democrat-voting Third-World backwater to lockstep Republican dynamo (with many pockets of deep poverty remaining, to be sure), with big increases in electoral votes to boot. It is the GOP’s new power base. And Florida, where the latest X-flag controversy has erupted, with its huge population, has become a must-win state for any politician hoping to be President.

Thanks to that, we now have the worst of both worlds: A dominant national party made up of people who hate the federal government in Washington for even existing, and are wistful for the days when blacks were slaves; who are also parochial, rally-round-the-flag nationalists ready to bomb any country that even looks at America funny. That’s a lot of unarticulated, pent-up hate and suspicion, directed both inward and outward. And the South is now the face of America to the world.

Witness what perverse effects this new political reality has on our national politicians, when asked to take a stand on the Confederate flag issue.
In 2000, presidential hopeful George W. Bush was asked in a GOP candidates' debate in South Carolina if he was "affronted" by the Confederate flag atop the capitol dome. Bush answered that the flag was a state’s rights issue, and the crowd cheered its approval. In February 2001, Bush’s brother, Governor Jeb, quietly ordered the removal of the flag that had flown at the Florida state capitol for 22 years. (It helps when a state’s rights are determined by your brother, who can save you from political embarrassment and having to take a stand.)

In May 2006, presidential hopeful and “straight-talker” John McCain publicly flip-flopped on Larry King Live after saying the Confederate flag in South Carolina was a matter of state’s rights: "I said that that was a state issue. It's not a state issue. It's a symbol that should not fly over the state capitol anywhere in America." He continued, "I said that it really wasn't any of my business ... that was an act of cowardice."

Having learned from others’ mistakes, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton minced her words in a February 2007 AP interview: "I think about how many South Carolinians have served in our military and who are serving today under our flag and I believe that we should have one flag that we all pay honor to, as I know that most people in South Carolina do every single day. I personally would like to see it removed from the Statehouse grounds."

South Carolinians, it goes without saying, care a great deal about what Hillary Clinton wants personally. I’m sure they’ll hop to it.

* * *
The second, and more often discussed downside of permitting the Confederate flag to fly publicly, is that it’s a slap in the face to every black American. No, the civil war was not just about slavery; nor does the Confederate flag represent only slavery – but slavery is certainly one of the things the flag stands for. To deny that is to deny history.

When I studied in Alabama, with a small black minority on campus, some obnoxious white students wore T-shirts emblazoned with the Confederate flag and the caption, “You wear your X, I’ll wear mine.” (Note: I never saw a black student crazy or dumb enough to wear an X hat or T-shirt on a Southern white campus!) The clear implication was that the Confederate flag stood in equal opposition to the X (as in Malcolm X) of the Black Power movement. Everybody understood it. Most white students thought the T-shirt was funny and clever. Don’t tell me the Confederate flag has no racist symbolism.

But again, until recently none of that was important, because African-Americans were second-class citizens in the law (the Black Codes, Jim Crow, "separate but equal"), and in our social mores. More than a century belated, blacks thankfully enjoy the full promise (well, nearly so) of Emancipation. And so now their thoughts and feelings – and votes – suddenly matter. And guess what? They’re terribly offended to see the rebel Confederate flag flying at State institutions in Georgia, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and South Carolina.

After WWII, we didn’t let the Germans fly the Nazi swastika for “sentimental” or “historical” reasons. Like the swastika, the Confederate battle flag is a uniquely incendiary symbol born out of violent defiance and an ideology of racial superiority. A symbol of liberty for some, but for too many others a symbol of bondage, it is simply too hurtful, too provocative to let fly freely and openly in the USA.
* * *
It is also illogical for the flag of a defeated nation to fly proudly in the victor’s halls of power. In 1861, the Confederacy seceded from the Union and seized a federal fort in South Carolina, starting the Civil War. By April 1865, after 1,000,000 had been killed or seriously wounded, the South was beaten by the United States of America, and the 11 rebel States were subsumed back into the Union.

Unfortunately, no politician today with national aspirations can afford to come out and say the commonsense truth: “Get that damned rebel battle flag out of our government buildings, before we charge you with treason!” The South is much too sensitive, with too many votes to give.

We right-thinking, patriotic Americans have appealed to the South’s better angels to do the right thing, and we’ve been rejected. So, my suggestion is to couch our objections in different terms. Terms which any red-blooded American jingoist can understand.

I’m talking about Loyalty Oaths.

We required them under Reconstruction (so-called “ironclad oaths”), retroactively, to get ex-Confederates out of public office. (Kind of a similar process to de-Ba’athification in Iraq.)

Also during Reconstruction, the magnanimous Lincoln-Johnson "10 percent" plan required at least 10 percent of voters in rebel states to to take an oath of allegiance to the United States, and pledge to abide by emancipation, before a state could be restored to the Union. (The Republican Congress had demanded 50%, not 10%, in the Wade-Davis Bill, but President Johnson refused, abiding by Lincoln.)

During WWII, President Truman required them (the so-called “Loyalty Program”) for “persons deemed suspect to holding party membership in organizations that advocated violent and anti-democratic programs.”

In 1972, in Cole v. Richardson, the Supreme Court upheld a Massachusetts oath that included a requirement to "uphold and defend" the Constitution and to "oppose the overthrow of the government ... by force, violence or by any illegal or unconstitutional method."

Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as: "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." The Confederacy certainly made war against the USA. And nobody in the history of the United States has come closer to destroying the U.S. Constitution and overthrowing the U.S. government than the Confederate States of America.

Lincoln, Johnson, Truman, and McCarthy were right: Especially in times of war, we need to know who’s on our side, and who isn’t. Does the South still identify with the Confederacy, or with the United States? They can’t have it both ways.
Congress should make loyalty oaths mandatory for all government officials in all 50 States and Guam. (Actually, we already ask state government officials to take an Oath to defend the U.S. Constitution, so if we really wanted, we could charge Confederate flag wavers in government with treason now). Then, if any government official at any level persists in flying a rebel flag, we prosecute him for a federal crime. Once enacted, such a law would have those X flags collecting dust in Florida basements before you could say “Look away Dixieland!”

Don’t make it a debate about slavery, morality, state’s rights, or anything else that white Southerners will reject out of hand. Make the issue simple: Are you a loyal American?

I can see country singer and ass-kicking Southern patriot Toby Keith scratching his head over the dilemma right now….

This big dog will fight
When you rattle his cage
And you'll be sorry that you messed with the U.S. of A.
'Cause we'll put in a boot in your ass
It's the American way.