1) Seek "safe" haven in unstable countries (the irony is the more dangerous the country, the safer al Qaeda and other flag-less militants are there), and further destabilize these countries with their terrorist attacks;2) Tempt the U.S. to put troops in these unstable countries so that the Islamist militants can take pot shots at them.
There are too many unstable countries these days; and the U.S. already has too few troops to cover two ongoing occupations in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Anyway, putting boots on the ground is a losing strategy. We know it, they know it. When we come in, all they have to do is wait us out. And occupations are damn expensive when austerity is in vogue.
And so drones are one answer to our dilemma. Drones aren't the only answer; nor should they be used willy-nilly; but I think it's right to keep on using them.
Look, countries that harbor or can't control the Islamist militants among them who operate with impunity -- like in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, etc. -- need to know that if they can't take care of free-ranging terrorist groups then then we will, in our own way. For example, how many years has the U.S. begged Pakistan to do something about the Taliban, to no avail?
Yes, I admit, drone strikes are a violation of other countries' sovereignty. And even if our drones don't rile up the masses there, then they certainly tick off government officials in the country getting droned, because drones reveal they're incapable of stopping the U.S. from doing what it wants. It's humiliating to them. On the other hand, drones are a clear indication that we have no intention of occupying and ruling these countries; we just want to destroy the bad guys. (Unfortunately we often kill a lot of innocent people in the process.)
So in this messy world we live in where the choices range between two poles -- do nothing; or invade and occupy -- drones are some kind of middle ground. Are they morally and ethically OK? Um, probably not. But then most wars aren't.
Kurt Volker's most disturbing point -- a question, really -- is what happens when countries like China, Iran and Russia start using drones how they see fit? Will the U.S. have a moral or legal leg to stand on in opposing them? I don't know.
By Kurt Volker
October 27, 2012 | Washington Post
