Showing posts with label Drugs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Drugs. Show all posts

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Give a kid crack, go to jail; give him a gun - OK!



I don't know what infuriates me more, these parents who gave their 5-year-old boy his own rifle, or his grandmother's reaction after he accidentally killed his baby sister with it:

It was God's will. It was her time to go, I guess I just know she's in heaven right now and I know she's in good hands with the Lord.

No, I think it' s because of terrible parents.  If they had given their son drugs they would be in jail now without child custody. But giving their son a deadly rifle that he kills his sister with?  That's just a terrible accident, say the police.  Time to forget and move on.

Man, our country is fffffff-ed up over guns.


By Leigh Remizowski
May 2, 2013 | CNN

Thursday, March 21, 2013

'Safety valve' to avoid mandatory sentences

Finally!  Lawmakers should make laws and let judges judge; they should not hamstring or box-in judges. Our federal prisons are bulging with non-violent drug offenders because of stupid mandatory sentencing rules that make judges irrelevant in the process.


By Mike Riggs
March 20, 2013 | Reason

Sunday, October 14, 2012

'Invisible Men': Overlooked black inmates

My goodness, what an oversight: 

[Professor of sociology Becky] Pettit realised that many surveys conducted by government agencies exclude people in the prison population from their research and findings. When Pettit added them in, she found that it dramatically altered the picture of the status of black America, as the number of black Americans in jail is disproportionately high. About half of the 2.3 million people in US prisons are black.

[...]  When prisoners are included, the employment rate for young black men who have dropped out of school sinks from an already low 42% to 26%.  

[...]  "We have developed a distorted view of how black Americans are faring in our society," Pettit said. The reason given for this in Pettit's work is the high rate of incarceration of black Americans. The rate is so steep that government estimates suggest that eventually one in three of all black male adults will spend some time in prison if current trends continue.

So why are so many black men locked up? The failed War on Drugs:

In the 1930s, blacks were three times more likely to be incarcerated than whites, but the figure now is seven times more likely. Some experts put this down to the "war on drugs", which has affected black communities far more than others, seeing increased arrests of blacks, often for non-violent offences. "There is no evidence that drug use is dramatically different by race or ethnicity, but the pattern of arrests is very different," said Ernest Drucker, author of a recent book, A Plague of Prisons.



By Paul Harris
October 13, 2012 | Observer

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Taxpayers pay twice for prison slave labor

[HT: Colbert Reportciting FoxNews].  Prison labor costs only 23 cents an hour, but this government-owned slaveholder company, UNICOR, still sells its uniforms to the U.S. military for more than its private-sector competitors, thanks to its quota from Congress, and it pockets the difference.  Nice work if you can get it.

UNICOR (previously Federal Prison Industries) even makes Patriot missiles!

All it takes to keep this Military-Industrial Slave Complex running is a perverse justice system that throws 1 out of every 31 U.S. adults -- 70 percent of them minorities -- in for-profit prisons, about 20 percent on harmless drugs convictions, costing taxpayers an average of $32,000 per inmate a year, and a Congressional quota. (And before my teabagger friends even ask, the answer is yes: $32 K is way more than inmates would get on welfare, not to mention the cost of police, interdiction, courts, etc.).

Monday, October 1, 2012

Mexicans kill people, not guns?

Just some vatos exercising their 2nd Amendment rights
I'll say it again, folks, I just don't get why FOX and the Right are so upset over the alleged selling of arms to Mexican drug cartels by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, aka "Fast and Furious."

People kill people, not guns.  It wouldn't matter if we sold them bazookas: no moral culpability on our side.  What they do with them is on their conscience.  In fact, we were just promoting free trade.

Moreover, there's no such thing as an "illegal" firearm.  God gave men -- including Mexican hombres -- the right to bear arms, period.  No law by men can take away that God-given right.  The 2nd Amendment clearly says "...shall not be infringed," and the Framers were masters of the English language, so that's exactly what they meant.  Any caliber, any size magazine, any quantity, automatic or semi- ... it doesn't matter.  God wants you to have access to everything.  (Limited of course only by the God-given precepts of the free market, i.e. your ability to pay.)

So I sincerely hope that my fellow firearms-rights defenders, my brothers-in-arms, are not selling out their core conservative beliefs just to score some political points in an election year.  

God does not approve this message.


October 1, 2012 | FoxNews

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Mexico's President to U.S.: Stop sending your guns

Poor Mexico.  We are ruining their country with our insatiable appetite for illegal drugs and our oversupply of legal firearms that enter their country without any impediments.

Meanwhile, Obama and the Democrats don't have the balls to take on the NRA and reinstate President Clinton's 1994 ban on assault-type weapons.


By Kathleen Hennessey
April 2, 2012 | McClatchy-Tribune News Service

Mexican President Felipe Calderon on Monday pushed for a revival of a ban on assault weapons in the U.S., arguing that the ban's expiration has led to the spread of guns across the border and a spike in violence in Mexico.

"The expiring of the assault weapons ban in the year 2004 coincided almost exactly with the beginning of the harshest - the harshest - period of violence we've ever seen," Calderon said, through an interpreter, at a White House news conference on Monday. The Mexican leader was in Washington to meet with President Barack Obama and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper for summit on economic cooperation and trade between the three countries. But the ongoing drug war in Mexico largely overshadowed those conversations.

In remarks to reporters in the Rose Garden, Calderon urged the U.S. to do more to tamp down on gun trafficking and emphasized that the drug cartels that crime organizations are operating on both sides of the border. He claimed a direct connection between the weakening of gun laws in the U.S. and deaths in his country.

"I know that if we don't stop the traffic of weapons into Mexico, if we don't have mechanisms to forbid the sale of weapons such as we had in the '90s, or for registry of guns, at least for assault weapons, then we are never going to be able to stop the violence in Mexico or stop a future turning of those guns upon the U.S.," he said.

Obama, whose administration has not pushed to reinstate the ban, did not respond to the Mexican president's statement directly. Democrats largely have called a truce when it comes to advancing new gun control legislation, a political calculation based on the party's attempts to appeal to more rural and Western voters.

The president promised to "keep on partnering" with Mexico on security issues.

"We recognize that we have a responsibility to reduce demand for drugs, that we have a responsibility to make sure that not only guns, but also bulk cash isn't flowing into Mexico," Obama said. "Obviously, President Calderon takes very seriously his responsibilities to apply effective law enforcement within Mexico. And I think he's taken courageous steps to do that."

Obama added that "innocent families and women and children being gunned down in the streets, that should be everybody's problem, not just their (Mexico's) problem."

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Drug testing for welfare recipients and clash of conservative values

This is a pretty good example of where conservatives' values collide, and one proves stronger: on the one hand, conservatives despise drug use as immoral, and they think it leads to crime and poverty; on the other hand, they want to cut government expenditures wherever possible.
In the case of drug testing for welfare recipients, it's a case of spending way more money on testing than can be saved by excluding drug abusers from welfare.
For example, since Florida mandated testing of welfare recipients last year, only 2 percent have failed the tests. Florida has had to eat the costs of tests for the 96 percent who passed.
But don't hold your breath waiting for Florida to cancel expensive drug testing. This is a case where conservatives want government to spend a lot of money to promote their values.
UPDATE (02.25.2012): GOP primary candidate Mitt Romney said that drug testing for welfare recipients was an "excellent idea," damn the costs. So there you go.

Commentary: Drug testing welfare recipients is a waste of taxpayers' money
By Mary Sanchez
February 20, 2012 | Kansas City Star
URL: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/02/20/139081/commentary-drug-testing-welfare.html#storylink=cpy

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Bloomberg: U.S. banks financing Mexico's drug cartels

Maybe the Bush Admin. got so distracted fighting terrorists' money laundering after 9/11 that he forgot about drug cartels' money laundering?

According to a Bloomberg report, Wachovia fired -- naturally! -- the head of its anti-money-laundering unit after he blew the whistle on the bank's laundering drug money for Mexican cartels. "If you don't see the correlation between the money laundering by banks and the 22,000 people killed in Mexico, you're missing the point," he said.

No big bank has ever been indicted for violating the Bank Secrecy Act or any other federal law. Large banks are protected from indictments by a variant of the too-big-to-fail theory, as Bloomberg reckoned: indicting a big bank could trigger a mad dash by investors to dump shares and cause panic in financial markets. "There's no capacity to regulate or punish them because they're too big to be threatened with failure."

Anyhoo, this is just one more reason to support increased concentration in the banking sector thanks to bailouts, and to trust free-marketeering bankers to always do the right thing.


By Robert Oak
June 29, 2010 | The Economic Populist

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Another year, another record for Army suicides

Oh my, Lib'rul Media, you aint what you used to be. Look at you, ignoring the elephant in the room.

Here CNN writes about record numbers of army suicides and drug abusers, but conveniently fails to mention that they're being deployed to s***holes Afghanistan and Iraq over and over again. CNN doesn't even speculate why so many soldiers are killing themselves. Likewise, the Army is officially baffled. I guess CNN considers it a big, unsolvable mystery, too. Anyway, I bet the solution is more frequent psychiatric testing and counseling. Yeah, that's the ticket.


By Mike Mount
November 18, 2009 | CNN

Suicides among soldiers this year have topped last year's record-breaking numbers, but Army officials maintain a recent trend downward could mean the service is making headway on its programs designed to reduce the problem, Army officials said Tuesday.

Since January, 140 active-duty soldiers have killed themselves while another 71 Army Reserve and National Guard soldiers killed themselves in the same time period, totaling 211 as of Tuesday, Gen. Peter Chiarelli, U.S. Army vice chief of staff, told reporters at a briefing Tuesday.
But he said the monthly numbers are starting to slow down as the year nears its end.

"This is horrible, and I do not want to downplay the significance of these numbers in any way," Chiarelli said.

For all of 2008, the Army said 140 active-duty soldiers killed themselves while 57 Guard and Reserve soldiers committed suicide, totaling 197, according to Army statistics.

The Army is still trying to tackle why soldiers are killing themselves.

[If the Army's cluelessness doesn't undermine your faith in their intelligence, then I don't know what will. But of course they know why. They just can't say it. - J]

"We still haven't found any statistically significant causal linkage that would allow us to effectively predict human behavior. The reality is, there is no simple answer -- each suicide case is as unique as the individuals themselves," Chiarelli said.

He also said there were troubling new statistics showing an increase in suicide rates among young soldiers who have never deployed, another factor puzzling Army researchers.

To add to the Army's problems, Chiarelli said there is a rise in numbers of soldiers abusing prescription drugs and alcohol upon returning from the war zones.

But Chiarelli said the news was not all grim.

"I do believe we are finally beginning to see progress being made," he said referring to a downward trend in suicide numbers in recent months. "The general trend line with the exception of a couple of months has been down."

"We attribute this reduction in the number of suicides to the many actions we have taken since February to inform and educate leaders and soldiers on this important issue," Chiarelli said.
Since March, the Army has implemented numerous programs and policies in an attempt to quickly slow the rate. Programs range from a suicide prevention task force to a day off from official duties to focus on suicide prevention. The service has implemented what it calls a Comprehensive Soldier Fitness Program, giving every soldier a mental assessment twice a year in the same style the Army tests soldiers for fitness.

"It gives the same emphasis to psychological, emotional and mental strength that we have previously given to physical strength," Chiarelli said.

The Army also has tested a program that gave mental-health evaluations to a group soldiers returning from the war zone. Some were treated face-to-face with mental-health providers while others were treated online by providers.

Chiarelli said the initial results were promising, and doctors said they could have great success treating patients online.

The test seems to give the Army some answers on how to treat the variety of soldiers from young to old.

"Younger soldiers prefer the online method of evaluation more than they do the face-to-face, and older soldiers -- some of you might not find this so surprising -- find face-to-face more to their liking," according to the general.

Chiarelli also gave examples of Army bases that seem to have shown improvement in suicide warning signs and prevention this year resulting in decreased number of suicide rates, including Fort Hood in Texas, Fort Bragg in North Carolina and Fort Drum in New York.

Fort Bragg has had six suicides to date, Fort Hood has had two and Fort Hood has had 11, but it is the largest U.S. military base with 60,000 troops.

There are Army posts, however, that were not showing signs of improvement.

"We are very concerned with the increase this year of suicide at Fort Campbell, Fort Stewart and Schofield Barracks," Chiarelli said.

Fort Campbell, in Kentucky, has had 18 suicides so far this year, with 11 of them occurring in the first quarter of 2009. Fort Stewart in Georgia has had 10 deaths, six of them occurring over the first five months of the year. And Schofield Barracks in Hawaii has had seven deaths.

All of the bases Chiarelli mentioned have different populations and deployment levels and reflect different suicide rates and ratios.

Chiarelli stressed his frustration with getting answers to the suicide problem.

"Everywhere I try to cut this and look at it to try to find out what the causal effect is, I get thwarted. And that's why we think that we've got to look in its totality at a whole bunch of different issues, and it's going to take time," he said.

Sunday, December 10, 2006

U.S. Imprisons More People Than Any Other Nation - USA! USA!

Land of the Free? Home of the Brave? Well, you probably have to be brave in prison, or else you end up as somebody's butt boy....

U.S. Imprisons More People Than Any Other Nation

By James Vicini, Reuters

WASHINGTON (Dec. 9) -- Tough sentencing laws, record numbers of drug offenders and high crime rates have contributed to the United States having the largest prison population and the highest rate of incarceration in the world, according to criminal justice experts.


A U.S. Justice Department report released on November 30 showed that a record 7 million people -- or one in every 32 American adults -- were behind bars, on probation or on parole at the end of last year. Of the total, 2.2 million were in prison or jail.


According to the International Center for Prison Studies at King's College in London, more people are behind bars in the United States than in any other country. China ranks second with 1.5 million prisoners, followed by Russia with 870,000. [Good company! -- J]


The U.S. incarceration rate of 737 per 100,000 people in the highest, followed by 611 in Russia and 547 for St. Kitts and Nevis. In contrast, the incarceration rates in many Western industrial nations range around 100 per 100,000 people.


Groups advocating reform of U.S. sentencing laws seized on the latest U.S. prison population figures showing admissions of inmates have been rising even faster than the numbers of prisoners who have been released.


"The United States has 5 percent of the world's population and 25 percent of the world's incarcerated population. We rank first in the world in locking up our fellow citizens," said Ethan Nadelmann of the Drug Policy Alliance, which supports alternatives in the war on drugs.


"We now imprison more people for drug law violations than all of western Europe, with a much larger population, incarcerates for all offenses."


Ryan King, a policy analyst at The Sentencing Project, a group advocating sentencing reform, said the United States has a more punitive criminal justice system than other countries.


More People to Prison

"We send more people to prison, for more different offenses, for longer periods of time than anybody else," he said.


Drug offenders account for about 2 million of the 7 million in prison, on probation or parole, King said, adding that other countries often stress treatment instead of incarceration.


Commenting on what the prison figures show about U.S. society, King said various social programs, including those dealing with education, poverty, urban development, health care and child care, have failed.


"There are a number of social programs we have failed to deliver. There are systemic failures going on," he said. "A lot of these people then end up in the criminal justice system."


Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in California, said the high prison numbers represented a proper response to the crime problem in the United States. Locking up more criminals has contributed to lower crime rates, he said.


"The hand-wringing over the incarceration rate is missing the mark," he said.


Scheidegger said the high prison population reflected cultural differences, with the United States having far higher crimes rates than European nations or Japan. "We have more crime. More crime gets you more prisoners."


Julie Stewart, president of the group Families Against Mandatory Minimums, cited the Justice Department report and said drug offenders are clogging the U.S. justice system.


"Why are so many people in prison? Blame mandatory sentencing laws and the record number of nonviolent drug offenders subject to them," she said.



http://articles.news.aol.com/news/_a/us-imprisons-more-people-than-any-other/20061209111509990004