Showing posts with label fiscal discipline. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fiscal discipline. Show all posts

Friday, March 21, 2014

Guerilla class warfare: IRS audits fewer rich, more poor people

Channeling the spirit of my man David Cay Johnston, I'm gonna tell you why this mundane story matters.

See, Republicans in Congress cynically under-fund the IRS year in, year out. So an undermanned, undertrained IRS makes do and does what comes easier, relatively -- auditing people with lower incomes. Because higher-income filers have lawyers and complicated returns and it requires more manpower to check them.  

What this works out to, in reality, is a calculated game of probability by rich filers: if you're wealthy, and you're lawyered up, chances are you'll come away unaudited; and even if you are audited, you'll come away unscathed.  

And so wealth inequality is a double-whammy for the poor and working class: earning so much less, they are still more likely to be audited. 

BECAUSE THAT'S THE WAY THE GOP WANTS IT.  Don't be naive and believe otherwise.

Finally, do I really have to explain how this makes no business sense?  As every auditor knows, you focus your attention on the weakest control points with the highest potential for losses. The potential for losses among poor filers is minimal, almost nil.  

All the Tea Partyers who are serious about fiscal health should cheer on  the IRS, because every dollar spent on the IRS  brings in $255 to the U.S. Treasury. Just by enforcing existing tax laws passed by Congress, nothing more. No other government agency can boast of such efficiency!  And so it's time for the TPs to put up or shut up about the IRS, the only government agency that reduces the federal deficit.


By  Patrick Temple-West
March 21, 2014 | Reuters

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service said on Friday that it audited fewer high-income Americans in 2013 than it did in 2012 or 2011, while it conducted more audits of people with no income.

Total audits fell by 5 percent from 2012 to reach the lowest level since 2008 as the IRS said it coped with budget cuts.

For the fiscal year that ended September 30, 2013, the IRS said it audited 24.2 percent of individual tax returns with adjusted gross income of $10 million or more. That was down from 27 percent in 2012 and 30 percent in 2011.

There were also fewer individual tax returns audited in the $5 million to $10 million gross income band, the IRS said.

In total, the IRS audited about 1.4 million individual returns. IRS Commissioner John Koskinen said in a statement that budget cuts at the agency have "presented challenges."

Wealthy Americans historically are the likeliest to be audited. The IRS a few years ago started a "Global High Wealth Industry Group" to audit high-wealth individuals more efficiently.

But Congress in January cut the IRS's fiscal 2014 budget by about 4 percent to $11.3 billion.

The funding cuts have forced the IRS to cut the number of customer service representatives it employs during tax season, Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union said in a statement. "Both taxpayers and employees are frustrated."

Last year, audits were done on 6 percent of individual tax returns reporting no gross income, up from 2.7 percent in 2012 and 3.4 percent in 2011.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Ben Stein: 'I hate to say this on Fox, but'...

Hey, I hate to say this on my blog, but... Ben Stein's a shithead.  

Seriously though, droning, nasally-voiced Ben Stein, one of those guys you scratch your head and wonder why he's still on TV and then think, "Oh, yeah, it's because he's on FoxNews," went and said something that pissed off FoxNews, seriously biting the hand that feeds him.  

The utterly revealing and pathetic thing about Stein's statement was that he a) acknowledged Fox's clear right-wing bias that is apparent to anyone over the age of 12, and, at the same time, b) he apologized profusely to FoxNews's overlords for saying what anybody who knows basic arithmetic figured out a long time ago.

For those sins, he will probably be banished to Doocy's Dungeon for the next six months.  ... Hey, that gives me an idea for a great show, "Fox Purgatory and Friends."  

Ben Stein's fame just goes to show that even a Mr. Burns-type villain could appear sort-of likable if Jimmy Kimmel was given the green light to mercilessly take the piss out of him every day on TV.


By Neetzan Zimmerman
October 18, 2012 | Gawker

Former Republican speechwriter and game show host Ben Stein likely won't be invited back on Fox & Friends any time soon after the conservative economist dropped a megaton truth bomb in the studio earlier this morning.

Asked by Gretchen Carlson what needs to be done in order to fix the economy, Stein said unequivocally that taxes need to be increased for upper-echelon earners.

"I hate to say this on Fox, and I hope I'll be allowed to leave here alive, but I don't think there is anyway we can cut spending enough to make a meaningful difference," Stein said"We going to have to raise taxes on very rich people, people with incomes of like say, 2, 3 million a year and up, and then slowly move it down."

Thinking he may have misheard the Ferris Bueller star, Steve Doocy asked Stein if he doesn't think "Washington just has a spending problem."

"I do not think they just have a spending problem," Stein replied. "I think they also have a too-low taxes problem. And while all due respect to Fox, whom I love like brothers and sisters, the taxes are too low."

Huffington Post notes that Stein clearly had a change of heart at some point, as just two years ago he called raising taxes on the very rich a "punishment."

Friday, October 5, 2012

What else is Romney 'completely wrong' about?

Gee, maybe Romney's also wrong about his denial that extending Dubya's tax cuts, plus another 20 percent cut across the board, will increase our national debt by about $4.8 trillion over 10 years? (This is not to mention $2.1 trillion in extra military spending he can't pay for either).  

Romney could make his campaign about anything and have a great shot at winning.  He could say he's in favor of rainbows and ice cream and probably win. But no, he had to propose two big-ass tax cuts that he knows he can't pay for. Why? What on earth?! Either somebody's pulling his strings, or he's mentally retarded, or both. There is no reason for him to go out on a limb with a lie like this, embarrassing himself, and insulting our intelligence. 

And all you "fiscal conservatives," all you Tea Partyers out there who are supposedly so worried about our national debt: you should all be ashamed of yourselves for letting him put this over on you, in your Party's name, as if you've forgotten elementary school arithmetic.  Stand with Romney now and you've lost all credibility (if you had any left).  


By Ashley Killough
October 4, 2012 | CNN

Monday, August 6, 2012

GOP reneges on spending cuts, says gov't creates private-sector jobs

Newsflash: Congressional Republicans say deficit spending is good and creates private-sector jobs!... As long as it's for defense-related industries.

Yo, where the Tea Parties at when we need them?  


By Dave Helling
August 6, 2012 | Kansas City Star